WASHINGTON, D.C. - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief Lee Zeldin has announced plans for a sweeping rollback of environmental regulations, igniting a fierce debate over potential health and economic impacts across the United States [1][2][3].

Zeldin framed the proposed changes as putting a "dagger through the heart of climate-change religion" and heralding a "Golden Age" for the American economy [1][2]. However, an Associated Press (AP) examination reveals that these regulations, if maintained, could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion annually [1][2][3].

The AP's analysis, which incorporated the EPA's own prior assessments and a range of other research, suggests that even a partial dismantling of these rules could lead to increased levels of pollutants such as smog, mercury, and lead [3][4]. Experts warn that this could result in more tiny airborne particles that can cause lung problems and other health issues [4].

"More people will die," stated Cory Zigler, a professor of biostatistics at Brown University who has studied the health impacts of environmental regulations [4].

The proposed rollbacks face a lengthy federal rulemaking process that requires public comment and scientific justification, meaning immediate changes are unlikely [1][3]. However, environmental experts express concern that even partial dismantling could have significant consequences [4].

As the debate unfolds, policymakers must weigh the potential economic benefits against the projected health and environmental costs. The outcome of this process could have far-reaching implications for air and water quality, public health, and climate change mitigation efforts across the United States [1][2][3][4].